Candidates using city's logo without permission

Published Monday May 5th, 2008
a1

Some candidates running for election to Miramichi city council are using the city logo on their elections signs without permission.

Click to Enlarge
Darcey McLaughlin photo
The city has not given permission for Miramichi’s logo to appear on election signs.

Candidates Loreen Mc- Grath, Hubert Sweezey, Chris Allison and Robert Trevors are all using the official city logo on their signs.

City clerk Jim Lamkey says they are doing this without approval from the city.

“We prefer people not to use the city logo. It’s not a good idea. We don’t allow people to use it,” he said.

He said one candidate asked for permission to use the logo and was turned down.

“... They were told no...nobody else has asked.”

While the city has not applied to trademark the logo, under Canadian law, copyright comes into existence immediately when intellectual property is created and the copyright owner — in this case the city — must be asked for permission if someone wants to use the logo.

The copyright owner can then give or restrict use of the intellectual property as it sees fit.

But while use of the logo without permission constitutes a copyright violation, it does not violate the elections act, said Elections New Brunswick spokesman Paul Harpelle.

“There’s nothing within the municipal voting act that dictates what they can or cannot put on the signs,” he said.

He said Elections New Brunswick had received a complaint that a candidate in Oromocto was using the “Welcome to Oromocto” sign in a pamphlet, but there is nothing in the elections act preventing a candidate from doing that.

“If the Town of Oromocto has a problem with it, then they might have an issue,” he said.

In addition to the use of the logo, Lamkey said, signs are also not allowed on city property without permission. The city owns the land 10 metres (33 feet) from either side of any road back to the curb and beyond. This means that usually the front part of most lawns in the city belong to the city — and this is often where signs are placed. It is also usually where utility poles are placed.

Candidates are also hanging signs on those utility poles, which is frowned upon.

Last month, NB Power and Aliant sent a letter asking candidates not to place signs on utility poles.

In the letter, the utilities said the signs are a hazard for workers climbing the poles for maintenance purposes. The letter also said staples that remain long after the election is over can cause workers to lose their footing.

The can also cause the poles to degrade faster, increasing expenses because of the need to replace them more often.

Lamkey said it is too late to do anything about it now, but the city will take steps next time to make sure candidates are aware of the rules, including the use of the city logo.

“Probably before the next election we’d send some kind of an information brochure to the elections office saying, ‘This is the position of the city of Miramichi,’” he said.

Please Log In or Register FREE

You are currently not logged into this site. Please log in or register for a FREE ONE Account.
Logged in visitors may comment on articles, enter contests, manage home delivery holds and much more online. Your ONE Account grants you access to features and content across the entire CanadaEast Network of sites.

Comments (4)

All comments are subject to the site Terms of Use. For a full commenting tutorial click here.

Our editorial team relies on filtering technology and our visitor community to identify inappropriate comments. In the event that a site user has submitted offensive content that has evaded our filter, please select the option to Flag As Inappropriate presented within the comment. Thank you for helping to keep this site clean.

Wow, seems like some unnecessary prejudice directed toward Sweezey here, as he is the only one pictured. This really shouldn't have been published until after the elections were over as it is not a pressing issue and could potentially affect the outcome of the elections.

When the well being of our community hangs in the balance when electing officials, there really is no need to create any negative feelings toward a small number of candidates over such a minute oversight.

If the city felt that this issue was significant enough then they could bring legal recourse against the "offenders", but even the owner of the copyright doesn't think that the issue is serious enough to warrant prosecution. There is no malice intended by the candidates, or advantage gained by including the logo. Perhaps a course in journalistic professionalism would be a worthwhile investment. Either that or using common sense, but I highly doubt that either will fill the pages of this rag.
7
Thumbs Up
8
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 05/05/08, 1:00:55 PM ADT
I have a suggestion. Let's have Rupert (one brick shy) Bernard put up a big poster in the middle of the City with the logo, and under his photo use these words: VOTE FOR ME, VOTE FOR EXPERIENCE! IF IT WASN'T FOR ME AND TINY TOT FRANK, WE'D HAVE NO CITY!

I wonder how many votes he'd get. Too funny.
5
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 06/05/08, 3:50:21 PM ADT
I'm sure he'd receive more votes than you would with a well-funded campaign
2
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 06/05/08, 5:08:52 PM ADT
I'd agree with the first poster be it not for the fact that one candidate actually followed proper channels by asking for permission to use the city logo and was turned down. This DOES make it an issue when others just go ahead and use the logo. And if you think the paper is a "rag" then your right NOT to read it is always an option.
1
Thumbs Up
2
Thumbs Down
Flag as Inappropriate
Flag as Inappropriate
Anonymous Reader on 07/05/08, 12:19:40 PM ADT
Advertisement
Advertisement

Search Articles